LEGAL EAGLE EYE NEWSLETTER
For the Nursing Profession


Request a complimentary copy
of our current newsletter


What is our mission?

What publication formats are available?

How do I start a subscription?

Can I cancel and get a refund?

Does my subscription renew automatically?


 

WHAT IS OUR MISSION?
      Our mission is to reduce nurses' fear of the law and to minimize nurses' exposure to litigation.  Nurse managers need to spot potential legal problems and prevent them before they happen. Managers and clinical nurses need to be familiar with how the law is applied by the courts to specific patient-care situations, so that they can act with confidence.  
    We work toward our goals every month by highlighting the very latest important Federal and state court decisions and new Federal regulations directly affecting nurses in hospitals, long term care facilities and home health agencies. We focus on nursing negligence and nurses' employment and licensing issues.    Our readers are professionals in nursing management, nursing education, clinical nursing, healthcare risk management, legal nurse consulting and law.

WHAT PUBLICATION FORMATS ARE AVAILABLE?
     The Email Edition is our most popular format.  You receive the newsletter as a PDF file attachment in an email sent to you every month.  On any computer or mobile device you simply click the file attachment to open, read, download, and/or print the newsletter. 
    The Email Edition is ideally suited to individuals.  It can also be used by large institutions.  Within an institution, like a hospital or university nursing department, an individual subscriber can forward pertinent articles to colleagues within the institution.  The content cannot be forwarded outside the institution or posted online.   An example might be a nursing director or director of nursing education who shares articles with nurse managers in individual clinical departments.
   The Online Edition is a format suited to educational and healthcare facility libraries with multiple users.  We send a link via email for the current monthly newsletter.  To open the link to the newsletter for that month the subscriber or other user must be using a computer or device whose IP address or range of IP addresses we have authenticated and given permission for online access.
     Print, Email and Online formats contain exactly the same content, eight pages with no advertising.

HOW DO I START A SUBSCRIPTION?

    The links below go to secure online sites maintained for us by Square, Inc. for credit and debit card purchases.  At checkout you will provide your name, payment information and email address.

Email Subscription $120/year

Print / Print + Email Subscription $155/year


     If you prefer, you can download and print an order form to mail or to scan and email to us.  Checks, credit and debit cards, purchase orders accepted, or we will bill you.  Order Form

CAN I CANCEL MY SUBSCRIPTION AND GET A REFUND?
     Yes. Just ask and the unused portion of your subscription will be refunded.

DOES MY SUBSCRIPTION RENEW AUTOMATICALLY?
     No. Before your annual subscription runs out you will receive a renewal notice by email and regular mail.

 

 

Legal Eagle Eye Newsletter

For the Nursing Profession

PO Box 1342 Sedona AZ 86339

(206) 718-0861 

 

info@nursinglaw.com 

 

 

 

Gender Bias: Male Nurse Did Not Have The Qualifications, Lawsuit Dismissed

  Quick Summary: Having a women-friendly environment on the OB/GYN unit does not necessarily mean the institution discriminates against male nursing applicants.

  If male nurses are deemed equally suited as female nurses to care for female patients, and hiring of male nurses is not precluded, there is no gender discrimination.  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, FLORIDA, 1998.

  The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida upheld the established legal principle that a male nurse who is turned down for a nursing position in favor of a female applicant may have the right to sue for gender discrimination in employment.

  However, like any other person filing a gender discrimination lawsuit, a male nurse has to prove each of the elements of his case to the court’s satisfaction. The nurse must prove he had all the legitimate qualifications for the position, that he actually applied for the position, that he was rejected despite his qualifications, and that the position was filled by a female applicant.

  The court ruled an employer is not liable for gender discrimination simply for requiring an applicant to possess the employer’s legitimate minimum expectations for a particular nursing position. The court said this hospital’s personnel posting and newspaper classified ads were legitimate in requiring two years recent med/surg nursing experience.

  The nurse in question had specialized training in ob/gyn and fill-in staff experience in ob/gyn, but no recent general med/surg experience, a legitimate core expectation for a successful applicant, in the courts view.

  The hospital was also on solid ground to insist an applicant document his prior work experience and make account for time gaps in his or her employment history. As a general rule, an applicant who fails in either of these areas can be turned down and not claim gender bias later, the court pointed out.

  The nurse somehow had obtained a copy of a fax the hospitals male chief operating officer had sent to the state hospital association asking for a legal opinion whether the hospital could have an all-female hiring policy in the ob/gyn unit.

  The court ruled that hospital managers seeking policy guidance on gender discrimination issues is not proof of conspiratorial intent to discriminate. And there was also no proof the chief operating officer had any input whatsoever in the hiring process, regardless what his attitudes happened to be.

  The court also ruled that a hospital ob/gyn unit serving only female patients can establish a formal policy of fostering a women-friendly environment for female patients. As long as male and female nursing applicants for the unit are considered solely on non-gender-related qualifications, the court said there is no gender discrimination. Wheatley v. Hospital, 16 F. Supp. 2d 1356 (S.D. Fla., 1998).

More from nursinglaw.com

http://www.nursinglaw.com/discrimination-male-nurse.htm

 

http://www.nursinglaw.com/malediscrim.htm

 

http://www.nursinglaw.com/discrimination-male-CNA.htm

 

http://www.nursinglaw.com/malefemale.htm