Neonate’s Death: Court Pins No Liability On Neonatal Nurses.

Legal Eagle Eye Newsletter for the Nursing Profession

May 2019    

  The Court cannot accept the parents’ nursing and medical experts’ opinions that the standard of care calls for every infant born at thirty-five weeks plus three days automatically to be cared for in the neonatal intensive care unit.  The nursing expert has pointed to no published standard and cannot say that that is standard practice at other hospitals.

  The parent’s nursing expert also faulted the nurses for failing to obtain a rectal temperature for the boy infant in addition to an axial temperature.  It was only speculation that the rectal temperature would have been higher.  Even if it were higher it was only speculation that that information would have led to an earlier diagnosis of meningitis and that that, in turn, would have led to successful treatment that would have avoided the tragic outcome.

  Although the nurses should have done so, it was also only speculation that reporting to the pediatrician the infant’s poor feeding and not voiding or producing stools on top of noting it in the chart would have affected the outcome for that baby. CALIFORNIA COURT OF APPEAL April 9, 2019

  Girl and boy twins were born three days past thirty-five weeks gestation a few hours after their mother came to the hospital with labor contractions and spot-ting.  Each weighed slightly more than 2,000 grams.  Just prior to giving birth the mother’s white count was 19.2 but her lab results were negative for Group B strep.  She was not given prophylactic antibiotics.  

  The on-call pediatrician wrote an order for transfer of both babies to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) per the hospital’s policy requiring transfer to the NICU for all neonates born at less than thirty-five weeks.  The babies were not immediately transferred.  The girl, three hours after birth, was sent to the NICU because of low blood glucose.  She was treated successfully for hypoglycemia and sepsis and was monitored for jaundice before being discharged home a week later a normal, healthy infant.

  The boy, however, was not sent to the NICU until late that afternoon after he turned blue while his mother tried to breastfeed him.  Neonatal apnea was suspected, but later a diagnosis of meningitis was confirmed.   He died five days later.

  The California Court of Appeal did not accept the testimony of the parents’ nursing expert and their expert pediatrician that there actually is a recognized standard in neonatal care that infants automatically are to be transferred to intensive care when born at thirty-five weeks.  Further, it was only speculation that transfer to the NICU immediately after birth or at the same time as his sister would have made any difference in the boy baby’s tragic outcome.  His sister’s altogether healthy outcome after going to the NICU much sooner in no way proved that his outcome would have been just as favorable if he had been sent to the NICU at the same time.

  It may have been nursing negligence that the nurses charted but failed to report to the physician that the boy was feeding poorly and not voiding or producing stools.  However, there was no proof that that failure affected the outcome. Brook v. Health, 2019 WL 1529163 (Cal. App., April 9, 2019).

More references from nursinglaw.com

http://www.nursinglaw.com/neonatal.htm

 

http://www.nursinglaw.com/neonatal-nursing-care.pdf

 

http://www.nursinglaw.com/newborn-nurse-testimony.htm

 

http://www.nursinglaw.com/neonatal2.pdf