LEGAL EAGLE EYE NEWSLETTER
For the Nursing Profession


Request a complimentary copy
of our current newsletter


What is our mission?

What publication formats are available?

How do I start a subscription?

Can I cancel and get a refund?

Does my subscription renew automatically?


 

WHAT IS OUR MISSION?
      Our mission is to reduce nurses' fear of the law and to minimize nurses' exposure to litigation.  Nurse managers need to spot potential legal problems and prevent them before they happen. Managers and clinical nurses need to be familiar with how the law is applied by the courts to specific patient-care situations, so that they can act with confidence.  
    We work toward our goals every month by highlighting the very latest important Federal and state court decisions and new Federal regulations directly affecting nurses in hospitals, long term care facilities and home health agencies. We focus on nursing negligence and nurses' employment and licensing issues.    Our readers are professionals in nursing management, nursing education, clinical nursing, healthcare risk management, legal nurse consulting and law.

WHAT PUBLICATION FORMATS ARE AVAILABLE?
     The Email Edition is our most popular format.  You receive the newsletter as a PDF file attachment in an email sent to you every month.  On any computer or mobile device you simply click the file attachment to open, read, download, and/or print the newsletter. 
    The Email Edition is ideally suited to individuals.  It can also be used by large institutions.  Within an institution, like a hospital or university nursing department, an individual subscriber can forward pertinent articles to colleagues within the institution.  The content cannot be forwarded outside the institution or posted online.   An example might be a nursing director or director of nursing education who shares articles with nurse managers in individual clinical departments.
   The Online Edition is a format suited to educational and healthcare facility libraries with multiple users.  We send a link via email for the current monthly newsletter.  To open the link to the newsletter for that month the subscriber or other user must be using a computer or device whose IP address or range of IP addresses we have authenticated and given permission for online access.
     Print, Email and Online formats contain exactly the same content, eight pages with no advertising.

HOW DO I START A SUBSCRIPTION?

    The links below go to secure online sites maintained for us by Square, Inc. for credit and debit card purchases.  At checkout you will provide your name, payment information and email address.

Email Subscription $120/year

Print / Print + Email Subscription $155/year


     If you prefer, you can download and print an order form to mail or to scan and email to us.  Checks, credit and debit cards, purchase orders accepted, or we will bill you.  Order Form

CAN I CANCEL MY SUBSCRIPTION AND GET A REFUND?
     Yes. Just ask and the unused portion of your subscription will be refunded.

DOES MY SUBSCRIPTION RENEW AUTOMATICALLY?
     No. Before your annual subscription runs out you will receive a renewal notice by email and regular mail.

 

 

Legal Eagle Eye Newsletter

For the Nursing Profession

PO Box 1342 Sedona AZ 86339

(206) 718-0861 

 

info@nursinglaw.com

 

Cytomegalovirus CMV: Caregivers Must Warn Patients Of Danger Of Contact With Persons At Risk

   Quick Summary: Pregnant women must be warned of the risk CMV poses to unborn infants.

   Healthcare professionals are well aware of the risk CMV poses to unborn infants. While they are not expected to know of all pregnant women who will come in contact with a particular patient who is infected, they must warn such patients that CMV is highly contagious and that they should avoid contact with pregnant women. SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, 1996.

   In a case recently handed down by the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, a mother gave birth to a child with certain abnormalities which gave rise to a suspicion of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Mother and child were tested and both were diagnosed as infected with CMV.

   Despite their diagnosis, the mother and child were visited at home by a friend who assisted with feeding and bathing the infant and with changing the diapers. The friend herself had just become pregnant. The friend continued to visit the mother during the first two trimesters of her own pregnancy and often assisted the mother in caring for the baby.

   The court believed the critical contact between the pregnant woman and the infant occurred in the mother’s home after she and her newborn had been discharged from the facility where they were diagnosed with CMV.

   Six months after she began visiting with the mother and assisting with her infant’s care, the friend learned for the first time that CMV is highly contagious and poses a special threat to pregnant women. She also learned that she herself had become infected with CMV, most likely from contact with her friend or her friend’s infant.

   The mother’s friend’s infant was born three months later. The friend’s infant died from CMV, having been affected by CMV in utero The friend filed suit against the medical facility which tested and diagnosed her friend and her friend’s infant, claiming damages for the death of her own infant and for her own infection with CMV.

   The court ruled that healthcare professionals have the legal duty to warn their patients who have highly contagious diseases, like CMV, hepatitis C and HIV, of the possibility of spreading their diseases to others in certain specific circumstances, and to point out to their patients examples of persons with whom they might come into contact who are particularly at risk of contracting their diseases from them.

   When a healthcare professional fails in the legal duty to warn a patient of the danger the patient’s disease poses to others, a person who gets a highly contagious disease from the patient can sue the healthcare professional for negligence, if the court can find, as in this case, that the healthcare professional’s failure to warn of the danger of contagion to persons at risk was the reason the person suing contracted the disease. Troxel vs. Hospital, 675 A. 2d. 314 (Pa. Super., 1996).