LEGAL EAGLE EYE NEWSLETTER
For the Nursing Profession


Request a complimentary copy
of our current newsletter


What is our mission?

What publication formats are available?

How do I start a subscription?

Can I cancel and get a refund?

Does my subscription renew automatically?


 

WHAT IS OUR MISSION?
      Our mission is to reduce nurses' fear of the law and to minimize nurses' exposure to litigation.  Nurse managers need to spot potential legal problems and prevent them before they happen. Managers and clinical nurses need to be familiar with how the law is applied by the courts to specific patient-care situations, so that they can act with confidence.  
    We work toward our goals every month by highlighting the very latest important Federal and state court decisions and new Federal regulations directly affecting nurses in hospitals, long term care facilities and home health agencies. We focus on nursing negligence and nurses' employment and licensing issues.    Our readers are professionals in nursing management, nursing education, clinical nursing, healthcare risk management, legal nurse consulting and law.

WHAT PUBLICATION FORMATS ARE AVAILABLE?
     The Email Edition is our most popular format.  You receive the newsletter as a PDF file attachment in an email sent to you every month.  On any computer or mobile device you simply click the file attachment to open, read, download, and/or print the newsletter. 
    The Email Edition is ideally suited to individuals.  It can also be used by large institutions.  Within an institution, like a hospital or university nursing department, an individual subscriber can forward pertinent articles to colleagues within the institution.  The content cannot be forwarded outside the institution or posted online.   An example might be a nursing director or director of nursing education who shares articles with nurse managers in individual clinical departments.
   The Online Edition is a format suited to educational and healthcare facility libraries with multiple users.  We send a link via email for the current monthly newsletter.  To open the link to the newsletter for that month the subscriber or other user must be using a computer or device whose IP address or range of IP addresses we have authenticated and given permission for online access.
     Print, Email and Online formats contain exactly the same content, eight pages with no advertising.

HOW DO I START A SUBSCRIPTION?

    The links below go to secure online sites maintained for us by Square, Inc. for credit and debit card purchases.  At checkout you will provide your name, payment information and email address.

Email Subscription $120/year

Print / Print + Email Subscription $155/year


     If you prefer, you can download and print an order form to mail or to scan and email to us.  Checks, credit and debit cards, purchase orders accepted, or we will bill you.  Order Form

CAN I CANCEL MY SUBSCRIPTION AND GET A REFUND?
     Yes. Just ask and the unused portion of your subscription will be refunded.

DOES MY SUBSCRIPTION RENEW AUTOMATICALLY?
     No. Before your annual subscription runs out you will receive a renewal notice by email and regular mail.

 

 

Legal Eagle Eye Newsletter

For the Nursing Profession

PO Box 1342 Sedona AZ 86339

(206) 718-0861 

 

info@nursinglaw.com 

 

EMTALA: Nurse Who Urged Employer To Self-Report An Incident Is Not A Whistleblower.

  The US Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) says that a hospital with an emergency department cannot discharge an emergency patient or send the patient to another facility until the patient has been appropriately screened and medically stabilized.

  The EMTALA also says that no hospital may penalize an employee who re-ports a violation of a requirement of the EMTALA to an outside authority.  In this case there was no report of a violation of the EMTALA to a governmental authority. There was only an expression of disagreement with the hospital committee's decision not to self-report the incident in the emergency department.

  Some whistleblower laws protect employees from employer retaliation who complain or voice opposition to what they believe in good faith is illegal conduct by their employer.  However, the EMTALA provides such protection only to an employee who makes an actual report to an outside authority. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS THIRD CIRCUIT June 12, 2018

  A pregnant patient came to a hospital's emergency room with pain and vaginal bleeding.  The hospital did not have a gynecologist on staff.  Emergency room personnel told her to go to a specific other hospital that had a gynecologist on staff.  The patient left the first hospital on her own.  Emergency room personnel at the first hospital did not arrange transportation for her and did not check to see that she actually arrived at the other hospital.

  The next day the hospital chief executive officer arranged a conference call to discuss whether the emergency department's handling of the patient's case was a violation of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA).  The day after that the parties to the conference call held a face-to-face meeting at the hospital.  The general consensus was that the handling of the patient in question's case was not an EMTALA violation.

  However, the Quality Project Coordinator disagreed with the majority view that no EMTALA violation had occurred.  She voiced her own opinion that the hospital should report itself to the state Department of Health.  No such report was ever made.  After another vocal disagreement with the hospital's handling of another patient-care incident, the Quality Project Coordinator was terminated.  

  The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (Pennsylvania) made note that the EMTALA provides whistleblower protection to a hospital employee who reports an actual or suspected EMTALA violation to a governmental authority.   The problem with this case was that the terminated employee only urged others to report what she believed was a violation of the EMTALA, but she never made any such report herself.  Merely voicing an opinion that the hospital should self-report is not enough to invoke EMTALA whistleblower protection. Gillispie v. Hospital, 2018 WL 2926014 (3rd Cir., June 12, 2018).

More references from nursinglaw.com

http://www.nursinglaw.com/whistleblower-nurse-discharge.htm

 

http://www.nursinglaw.com/whistleblower.htm

 

http://www.nursinglaw.com/whistleblower-collective-bargaining.htm

 

http://www.nursinglaw.com/whistleblower-nurse.htm

 

http://www.nursinglaw.com/whistleblower-nurse-court-case.htm