Legal Eagle Eye Newsletter for the Nursing Profession (7)6 Jun 99

   Quick Summary: The court ruled the hospital was to blame for faulty maintenance of its premises and facilities. Since there was no way the nurse’s aide could have foreseen the lamp would fall on the baby, the aide was not at fault.

   Prior to a circumcision procedure in the newborn nursery, after positioning the infant, a nurse’s aide attempted to adjust a lamp attached to the wall. The lamp came off the wall and struck the infant, causing an epidural hematoma and facial lacerations which left scars.

   The Court of Appeals of Indiana had to decide whether this was a case of professional healthcare malpractice by the nurse’s aide, or a case of ordinary negligence by the hospital’s maintenance staff. The parents could proceed against the state’s patient compensation fund only if it was a malpractice case.

Pluard v. Patient’s Compensation Fund, 705 N.E. 2d 1035 (Ind. App., 1999).