Legal Eagle Eye Newsletter for the Nursing Profession (7)6 Jun 99
Quick Summary: The court ruled the hospital was to blame for faulty maintenance of its premises and facilities. Since there was no way the nurses aide could have foreseen the lamp would fall on the baby, the aide was not at fault.Prior to a circumcision procedure in the newborn nursery, after positioning the infant, a nurses aide attempted to adjust a lamp attached to the wall. The lamp came off the wall and struck the infant, causing an epidural hematoma and facial lacerations which left scars.
The Court of Appeals of Indiana had to decide whether this was a case of professional healthcare malpractice by the nurses aide, or a case of ordinary negligence by the hospitals maintenance staff. The parents could proceed against the states patient compensation fund only if it was a malpractice case.
Pluard v. Patients Compensation Fund, 705 N.E. 2d 1035 (Ind. App., 1999).