|
LEGAL EAGLE EYE NEWSLETTER For the Nursing Profession Request a complimentary copy of our current newsletter What is our mission? What publication formats are available? How do I start a subscription? Can I cancel and get a refund? Does my subscription renew automatically? |
| WHAT IS OUR MISSION? |
| Our mission is to reduce nurses' fear of the law and to minimize nurses' exposure to litigation. Nurse managers need to spot potential legal problems and prevent them before they happen. Managers and clinical nurses need to be familiar with how the law is applied by the courts to specific patient-care situations, so that they can act with confidence. |
|
We work
toward our goals every month by highlighting the very latest
important Federal and state court decisions and new Federal
regulations directly affecting nurses in hospitals, long term care
facilities and home health agencies. We focus on nursing negligence
and nurses' employment and licensing issues.
|
|
WHAT PUBLICATION FORMATS ARE AVAILABLE? |
|
The Email
Edition is our most popular format.
You receive the newsletter as a PDF file attachment in an email
sent to you every month. On
any computer or mobile device you simply click the file attachment to
open, read, download, and/or print the newsletter. |
|
The Email
Edition is ideally suited to individuals.
It can also be used by large institutions.
Within an institution, like a hospital or university nursing
department, an individual subscriber can forward pertinent articles to
colleagues within the institution.
The content cannot be forwarded outside the institution or posted
online. An example
might be a nursing director or director of nursing education who shares
articles with nurse managers in individual clinical departments |
|
The Online Edition is a format suited to educational and healthcare
facility libraries with multiple users.
We send a link via email for the current monthly newsletter.
To open the link to the newsletter for that month the subscriber
or other user must be using a computer or device whose IP address or
range of IP addresses we have authenticated and given permission for
online access. |
|
Print, Email and Online
formats contain exactly the same content, eight pages with no
advertising. |
|
The links below go to secure online sites maintained for
us by Square, Inc. for credit and debit card purchases.
At checkout you will provide your name, payment information and email address. |
Email Subscription $120/year |
|
Print / Print + Email Subscription $155/year |
|
If you prefer, you can download and print an order form to mail
or to scan and email to us.
Checks, credit and debit cards, purchase orders accepted, or we will
bill you. |
|
CAN I CANCEL MY SUBSCRIPTION AND GET A REFUND? |
|
Yes. Just ask and the
unused portion of your subscription will be refunded. |
|
DOES MY SUBSCRIPTION RENEW AUTOMATICALLY? |
| No. Before your annual subscription runs out you will receive a renewal notice by email and regular mail. |
Legal Eagle Eye Newsletter
For the Nursing Profession
PO Box 1342 Sedona AZ 86339
(206) 718-0861
Drug Testing - Urine Samples Mixed Up: Hospital Can Be Sued For Negligence
Quick Summary: A person falsely accused of a positive drug test can sue for negligence if proper steps are not followed and urine samples get mixed up.
To prevent wrongful termination of an employee based on an incorrectly labeled drug-test urine specimen, the hospital had a detailed collection protocol.
The specimen was to stay in the presence of the person from whom it was collected while the specimen container was capped, labeled and sealed. In addition, the contained was to be initialed by the person before it could be sent to an outside lab for testing.
If proper steps are not followed, and urine samples get mixed up, a person falsely accused of a positive drug test can sue for negligence. DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, 1997.
A county corrections officer sued the hospital where she was sent for a required physical examination. The officer’s suit alleged the hospital was negligent for mixing up her drug-test urine sample with a sample from another individual, resulting in false allegations against the officer of cocaine use.
The District Court of Appeal of Florida ruled there were grounds for a lawsuit. The lower court was wrong for throwing out the suit. The officer was entitled to her day in court to try to prove her case, that is, that the hospital had not followed its own strict procedures to insure that drug-test urine samples are not mixed up. Lynn vs. Medical Center, 692 So. 2d 1002 (Fla. App., 1997).