LEGAL EAGLE EYE NEWSLETTER
For the Nursing Profession


Request a complimentary copy
of our current newsletter


What is our mission?

What publication formats are available?

How do I start a subscription?

Can I cancel and get a refund?

Does my subscription renew automatically?


 

WHAT IS OUR MISSION?
      Our mission is to reduce nurses' fear of the law and to minimize nurses' exposure to litigation.  Nurse managers need to spot potential legal problems and prevent them before they happen. Managers and clinical nurses need to be familiar with how the law is applied by the courts to specific patient-care situations, so that they can act with confidence.  
    We work toward our goals every month by highlighting the very latest important Federal and state court decisions and new Federal regulations directly affecting nurses in hospitals, long term care facilities and home health agencies. We focus on nursing negligence and nurses' employment and licensing issues.    Our readers are professionals in nursing management, nursing education, clinical nursing, healthcare risk management, legal nurse consulting and law.

WHAT PUBLICATION FORMATS ARE AVAILABLE?
     The Email Edition is our most popular format.  You receive the newsletter as a PDF file attachment in an email sent to you every month.  On any computer or mobile device you simply click the file attachment to open, read, download, and/or print the newsletter. 
    The Email Edition is ideally suited to individuals.  It can also be used by large institutions.  Within an institution, like a hospital or university nursing department, an individual subscriber can forward pertinent articles to colleagues within the institution.  The content cannot be forwarded outside the institution or posted online.   An example might be a nursing director or director of nursing education who shares articles with nurse managers in individual clinical departments.
   The Online Edition is a format suited to educational and healthcare facility libraries with multiple users.  We send a link via email for the current monthly newsletter.  To open the link to the newsletter for that month the subscriber or other user must be using a computer or device whose IP address or range of IP addresses we have authenticated and given permission for online access.
     Print, Email and Online formats contain exactly the same content, eight pages with no advertising.

HOW DO I START A SUBSCRIPTION?

    The links below go to secure online sites maintained for us by Square, Inc. for credit and debit card purchases.  At checkout you will provide your name, payment information and email address.

Email Subscription $120/year

Print / Print + Email Subscription $155/year


     If you prefer, you can download and print an order form to mail or to scan and email to us.  Checks, credit and debit cards, purchase orders accepted, or we will bill you.  Order Form

CAN I CANCEL MY SUBSCRIPTION AND GET A REFUND?
     Yes. Just ask and the unused portion of your subscription will be refunded.

DOES MY SUBSCRIPTION RENEW AUTOMATICALLY?
     No. Before your annual subscription runs out you will receive a renewal notice by email and regular mail.

 

 

Legal Eagle Eye Newsletter

For the Nursing Profession

PO Box 1342 Sedona AZ 86339

(206) 718-0861 

 

info@nursinglaw.com 

 

Elopement Risk: Psychiatric Facility's Staff Faulted For Patient's Escape, Suicide. 

  When a psychiatric patient has been assessed as potentially suicidal, suicide and elopement precautions must be undertaken at once.

  If the patient is on an "open" psych unit, this may mean initiating a transfer to a more secure setting. In the mean time, the doors to the facility should be locked.

  A suicidal patient should be monitored continuously or physically secluded pending transfer to the security of a locked setting.

  A patient’s suicidal condition and elopement risk must be communicated at once to all staff members.

  All staff who have keys to the unit, physicians, nurses, counselors and non-professionals, whether or not they are assigned to care for that patient, are responsible for preventing the patient’s escape.

   All staff must be taught that any time they unlock a door, especially in a setting where the doors normally are not locked, the potential exists for a patient to elope whose safety from self-harm may be compromised by elopement.  COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS, 1995.

   There were two doors between the psych unit and the outside. An alert patient bent on elopement could dash through one door with relative ease as it was unlocked from the inside or the outside by a staff member, but it would be almost impossible to get past both doors, if both were locked and staff were properly vigilant. It was an "open" unit, and normally neither door was locked.

   However, in a recently-published court opinion from the Court of Appeals of Texas, despite the fact that a patient had been assessed by the psychiatric medical staff as a potential elopement and suicide risk, only the outer door was locked. Between the two doors were the phones the patients used. The patient in question, who had not been secluded and was not being closely watched while arrangements were being made to transfer him to a locked facility, walked out and pretended to use the phone. When the unit secretary unlocked the outer door from the outside, to get her purse so she could go to lunch, the patient made his escape.

   Staff from the facility and the police went after him, but only got close enough to watch him run out on an Interstate highway to be struck by a truck and killed. The court ruled the family had the right to bring a lawsuit against the facility and its staff.

   According to the court, doors must be securely locked when a patient is an elopement and suicide risk. All staff must be informed when a patient is an elopement and suicide risk. The responsibility for informing all the staff starts with the physician or other professional who makes the assessment, and extends to all professional and non-professional staff who are warned, whether or not the patient has been assigned as theirs to care for. Physical seclusion and close or continuous monitoring are also advisable in addition to locking the doors securely and alerting all the staff, the court ruled. Bossley vs. Mental Health, 934 S.W. 2d 689 (Tex. App., 1995).