Delay In Transfer To Another Hospital: Nurse Ruled Not Guilty Of Negligence
Legal Eagle Eye Newsletter for the Nursing Profession
September 1997
Quick Summary: The court ruled there is no legal standard mandating a specific maximum number of minutes to effect for a patients transfer to another facility. Nurses and physicians are guided by their best professional judgment.
The hospital was not equipped to handle a premature infant born in the twenty-sixth week, so the physician decided to transfer the patient to an urban medical center with appropriate facilities, some ninety miles away.
The patient came to the emergency room believing she was in labor. She was in her twenty-sixth week and it was her first pregnancy. The physician examined her. He found her cervix was not dilated, but believed premature labor had in fact started.
An ambulance was called. It arrived fifty minutes later. The patient was put on board twenty minutes later and it took an additional thirty-some minutes before the ambulance left, with the nurse along.
Half way into the trip, the patients water broke. The nurse examined her and found her cervix dilated six centimeters and the babys head was visibly emerging. The nurse decided to redirect the ambulance to the nearest hospital, where the baby was delivered. A neonatal transport team came from the hospital which was the original destination and took the newborn the rest of the way. The child was blind and profoundly retarded. The family sued the first hospital, alleging the nurse was negligent for delaying the original transfer.
The Court of Appeals of Ohio upheld the trial judges decision to dismiss the lawsuit. A physician neonatologist who came in from Arizona testified the fifty-some minutes delay from when the ambulance arrived until when it left was beneath the standard of care for the nurse, but the court elected to disregard the testimony. Blodgett vs. Kahn, 681 N.E. 2d 452 (Ohio App., 1996).